-
>
中共中央在西柏坡
-
>
中國歷代政治得失
-
>
中國共產(chǎn)黨的一百年
-
>
在慶祝中國共產(chǎn)主義青年團(tuán)成立100周年大會(huì)上的講話
-
>
中國的民主
-
>
中華人民共和國六十年實(shí)錄(套裝共10冊(cè))
-
>
新書)社會(huì)主義發(fā)展簡史(大字本)
英國平等派 版權(quán)信息
- ISBN:7562023840
- 條形碼:9787562023845 ; 978-7-5620-2384-5
- 裝幀:簡裝本
- 冊(cè)數(shù):暫無
- 重量:暫無
- 所屬分類:>>
英國平等派 內(nèi)容簡介
本書為劍橋政治思想史原著系列之一,書中論述了英國17世紀(jì)的激進(jìn)民主運(yùn)動(dòng)。
英國平等派 目錄
Chronological table
Bibliographrcal note
Notes on the texts
Leveller texts
1 John Lilburne,
2 William Walwyn.
3 John Lilburne
4 Richard Overton with William Walwyn's collabor-ation
5 Richard Overton,
6 William Walwyn,
7 Severalhands,
8 Members ofthe New Model Army and civilian Level-Alers
9 John Lilburne and others
10 John Lilburne
11 William Walwyn.
12 John Lilburne
13 John Lilburne.
Select biographies
Index
英國平等派 節(jié)選
The Levellers were to work with the officers again, and they were to moderate their claim that England was now reduced to a state ofnature. But in 1649, after the Army had finally decided it could not work with the king and an unpurged parliament - after it had executed the king and set up a commonwealth on the basis that 'the people are, under God, the original of all just power'-Lilburne told the judge at his trial for treason in 1649 that there was 'no magistracy in England either upon principles of law or reason'. He was asking of Cromwell what Cromwell had asked of them in 1647: what gave a few men the right to constitute authority in England? It certainly could not be simply that they had swords in their hands, though subsequent Leveller activity and doctrine (text 13), while it denied that proposition in so far as the New Model officers held the sword, did not deny its use to an armed common soldiery. At this point we must ask who the Levellers thought had the right not only to speak about and complain about the organisation of magis- tracy, but also to constitute, to be members of, to oversee, even to overpower governments, and why. Their answer throughout their careers was clear enough but in no way capable of being institutional- ised. They believed that God ordained, and God's creation - nature - displayed, the existential equality of authority among human beings, their natural right to sustain and defend themselves and their natural duty to defend and succour others. Such creatures were duty-bound to God, and through God to others, to erect and sustain political society. The only way they could constitute authority was by their consent; and the only proper authority - the only authority which they could consti-tute and subsequently obey - would be o'ne which they in fact continu-ally consented to and which acted as the trustee of each and every one of them for the purpose of attaining the common weal. The men who held magistracy could be only those committed to those ends. ……
- >
苦雨齋序跋文-周作人自編集
- >
朝聞道
- >
人文閱讀與收藏·良友文學(xué)叢書:一天的工作
- >
月亮虎
- >
有舍有得是人生
- >
巴金-再思錄
- >
姑媽的寶刀
- >
山海經(jīng)