掃一掃
關(guān)注中圖網(wǎng)
官方微博
本類五星書更多>
-
>
心靈元氣社
-
>
縣中的孩子 中國縣域教育生態(tài)
-
>
(精)人類的明天(八品)
-
>
厭女（增訂本）
-
>
這樣學習才高效/楊慧琴
-
>
心理學經(jīng)典文叢:女性心理學
-
>
中國文化5000年
現(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型 版權(quán)信息
- ISBN：9787811105919
- 條形碼：9787811105919 ; 978-7-81110-591-9
- 裝幀：一般膠版紙
- 冊數(shù)：暫無
- 重量：暫無
- 所屬分類：>
現(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型 本書特色
《現(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型》是由安徽大學出版社出版的。
現(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型 內(nèi)容簡介
本書把與漢語被動句生成相關(guān)的問題歸結(jié)為以下七個問題：保留賓語現(xiàn)象；漢語“被”字的語類特征及句法地位；領有名詞提升現(xiàn)象；接應代詞現(xiàn)象；零主語被字句等。
現(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型 目錄
序Acknowledgements前言Chapter 1 Introductory Remarks1.1 About the Principles & Parameters approach 1.2 The unsolved tension between descriptive adequacy and explanatory adequacy observed in the theorizati0h of Mandarin passive constructions 1.3 Theoretical objectives of the book1.4 Outline of the bookChapter 2 Overview of Related Literature: Problems and Partial Conclusions Therein2.0 Introduction2.1 Chomsky's Standard Theory (ST) and the Chinese bei-constructions 2.1.1 English passivization in the light of ST2.1.2 Chinese passivization in the light of ST2.1.3 Problems and some preliminary conclusions2.2 Chomsky's GB theory and Chinese bei-constructions regarded as passives2.2.1 Maturation of the view on English passivization : by-phrase as a VP-adjunct2.2.2 Establishing the passive status of the bei-less patient subject sentence2.2.3 The categorial status of bei2.2.4 The Case-absorption theory of the English and Chinese passivizations2.2.5 Summary2.3 The GB theory and the Chinese bei-constructions regarded as non-passives2.4 The Minimalist Program and the Mandarin passive studies2.4.1 A brief account of the Minimalist Program and the English passivization in minimalist terms2.4.2 Characterizations of the Chinese passivization in minimalist terms2.5 Recapitulation of this chapterChapter 3 Remodeling the Chinese Passivization along the Derivational Line3.0 Introduction3.1 Postulation of Va in the Chinese passivization3.1.1 Objections to the view of argument augmentation in Chinese passives3.1.2 Questioning the view of patient subjectivization and/or agent adjunctivization3.1.3 The way out3.2 Conceptualization of Chinese passives and postulation of TdefP3.2.1 Croft's tripartite event ICMs and the "derived voice" 3.2.2 Cognitive semantics of Chinese passives 3.2.3 Summary
展開全部
現(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型 節(jié)選
《現(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型》還對漢語被字句中的接應代詞的指稱情況作了比較深人的考察，并提出了兩種解釋方案。其一，將被字句中的接應代詞和漢語主題句中的接應代詞視為同一類型，即變項（variable）空語類的顯性表現(xiàn)，它與被動句主語的同標關(guān)系借助于空算子操作得以實現(xiàn)；其二，將其看作是空語類pro的顯性表現(xiàn)，在這種情況下，它與被動句主語的同標關(guān)系實際上依賴于被動句的認知語義特點以及一定的常規(guī)關(guān)系，因而具有一定的不確定性。但是無論哪種情況，接應代詞的使用都遵守約束理論！冬F(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型》中所建的漢語被動化模型具有相當?shù)撵`活性。具體表現(xiàn)在對漢語形式被動句、領屬被動句以及兼語被動句的生成解釋上。比如，由于空動詞Va的設立，我們便可以免予陷入被動語素在兼語被動句中如何附綴的問題。同樣，由于Va的設立，我們便可以根據(jù)徐杰（2001）提出的焦點結(jié)構(gòu)以及焦點特征形式化理論解釋形式被動句的生成原理。Va的設立還可以使我們根據(jù)被動句的認知語義特點以及常規(guī)關(guān)系對漢語領屬被動句中的領屬語義關(guān)系進行解釋。
現(xiàn)代漢語被動式原則與參數(shù)模型 相關(guān)資料
插圖：The later modeling of the Chinese plasticization established within GB is claimed to be much more adequate explanatorily due to the initiation of the Case Theory into the scene. But unless we had an adequate account for the retained object phenomenon。the accusative Case absorption view of plasticization would remain a questionable matter. The view is actually discarded in A. Li（1990）， where jt is held that the passive morpheme in Chinese is irrelevant to plasticization. However. the Case Theory continues to be employed in a significant way to account for the Chinese plasticization but it works on the assumption that Case assignment in Chinese is characterized by directionality. With respect to the retained object phenomenon，A. Li’s modeling is only partially effective because it could not explain the derivation of such passives as having a retained object holding no possession relation with the passive subject. It also fails Oil some other grounds.The frustrating problem of retained object in certain Chinese passives， together with some others，actually leads many people to treat the bei· constructions as non-passive sentences，thus dispensing completely with the Case absorption view of plasticization now that no passive morpheme whatsoever could be present and at work .The Chinese bei is taken as a full verb in this case，and it takes either a finite clause or a non. finite structure. Under beth circumstances，the problem of retainer &object disappears since the post verbal object is a normal base-generated one fully in consistency with the Case Filter and thus loses the motivation for movement. In other words，the object concerned has no“retainedness”to speak of，However，no sooner is the retained object problem curbed than other problems crop up. Most notably， many of the studies that take bei——constructions as non——passives fail to account for the co-indexing between the post verba
書友推薦
- >
回憶愛瑪儂
- >
唐代進士錄
- >
二體千字文
- >
巴金－再思錄
- >
莉莉和章魚
- >
名家?guī)阕x魯迅:朝花夕拾
- >
李白與唐代文化
- >
自卑與超越
本類暢銷
